10 Leading Companies with 4-Day Workweeks

The conventional five-day workweek has dominated professional life for generations. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic forced organizations to reconsider established workplace norms, including the structure of the workweek itself. As companies sought flexibility during uncertain times, many implemented reduced hours as temporary measures. This pivot, however, initiated a fundamental reexamination of how we structure work time.

With advancements in productivity-enhancing technologies, growing recognition of mental health impacts, and renewed emphasis on work-life integration, shorter workweeks present a viable alternative to traditional models. Critical examination reveals that the 4-day workweek isn't merely a passing trend but potentially a significant paradigm shift in workplace organization.

Understanding the 4-Day Workweek Framework

The 4-day workweek represents more than simply reducing workdays; it embodies distinct implementation approaches that organizations must carefully consider. These models vary in hours worked and scheduling flexibility, each with specific operational implications.

Standard Reduced-Hour Model

The standard reduced-hour model decreases weekly working hours from the conventional 40 to 32, maintaining the same daily hours (typically 8) but eliminating one workday. This represents a true reduction in total work time while maintaining full compensation - often described as the "100-80-100" principle (100% pay for 80% time with 100% productivity).

Compressed Workweek Model

The compressed workweek maintains 40 total working hours but redistributes them across four days instead of five, resulting in longer 10-hour workdays. This approach preserves total working time while providing a three-day weekend.

A significant data point: According to recent workforce surveys, 77% of American workers would prefer a compressed 4-day schedule over the traditional 5-day arrangement, even with the longer daily hours. This indicates strong employee preference for concentrated work periods followed by extended recovery time.

Hybrid and Flexible Approaches

Beyond these primary models, organizations increasingly implement hybrid approaches:

Alternating 4-day weeks (e.g., working 4 days one week, 5 days the next)

Seasonally adjusted schedules (reduced hours during summer months)

Team-based rotations to maintain five-day operational coverage

Each implementation requires thoughtful analysis of organizational needs, industry requirements, and workforce preferences.

Global Implementation of 4-Day Workweeks

The movement toward shortened workweeks extends beyond individual company policies to national initiatives and large-scale trials.

Countries Leading the Charge

Belgium stands as the first nation to formalize 4-day workweek rights, allowing all employees to request compressed workweek arrangements. However, implementation data reveals important context: only 0.8% of Belgian workers had transitioned to this model within a year of the policy's introduction, indicating potential barriers between policy availability and practical adoption.

Iceland's extensive public sector trials of reduced working hours (without reduced pay) demonstrate the most comprehensive governmental approach, with results compelling enough to drive widespread adoption across numerous workplaces. The Icelandic model focused on actual hour reduction rather than day compression, providing useful comparative data.

International Experimentation

Major trials have occurred across diverse economies, each producing valuable implementation data:

United Kingdom: A comprehensive trial involving 70+ companies across multiple sectors reported 92% continuing the practice after the experimental period

Japan: Government-backed initiatives encouraging companies to adopt 4-day weeks to address work-life balance issues in a traditionally long-hour work culture

Spain: Government-subsidized pilot program allowing companies to test reduced hours with financial support

New Zealand: High-profile company trials that provided early proof-of-concept for performance improvements

These international experiments consistently demonstrate productivity maintenance or improvement, reduced absenteeism, and enhanced employee well-being - providing the empirical foundation for broader adoption.

Current Adoption Trajectory

Despite compelling evidence from trials, organizational inertia and implementation uncertainties have limited widespread adoption. However, recent data suggests acceleration: a KPMG analysis found 30% of major U.S. corporations actively exploring alternative work schedules, including 4 and 4.5-day arrangements.

This represents a significant shift from previous years, indicating momentum toward normalized reduced-hour work arrangements. Decision-makers increasingly recognize the competitive advantage in talent attraction and retention that such policies provide.

10 Leading Companies Pioneering 4-Day Workweeks

These organizations represent diverse industries and implementation approaches, demonstrating the versatility of reduced workweek models.

1. Microsoft Japan

Industry: Technology/Software Headquarters: Redmond, Washington, USA Implementation Model: In 2019, Microsoft Japan conducted a trial reducing workweeks to four days without reducing compensation. The experiment yielded a 40% productivity increase and 23% reduction in electricity costs.

The company has since expanded flexible work discussions across its global operations, using the Japan results as empirical evidence. Their implementation demonstrates how large, established enterprises can successfully transition to reduced-hour models.

2. Unilever New Zealand

Industry: Consumer Goods Headquarters: Auckland, New Zealand (parent company: London, UK) Implementation Model: Unilever initiated a year-long trial in 2020 where employees maintained full salary while working 80% of standard hours. Following successful results, they extended the policy permanently in 2022, with employees working four-day weeks without salary reduction.

As a multinational corporation with 155,000 global employees, Unilever's adoption represents significant validation of the model's scalability for large organizations.

3. Panasonic

Industry: Electronics Manufacturing Headquarters: Osaka, Japan Implementation Model: Panasonic introduced optional 4-day workweeks for employees in 2022, allowing staff to use the additional day for secondary employment, volunteer activities, or family responsibilities. This represented a major shift in Japan's traditionally rigorous work culture.

Panasonic's implementation is particularly significant given Japan's historical resistance to workstyle reform, demonstrating how even organizations in conservative business cultures can adapt to new work models.

4. Bolt

Industry: Transportation Technology Headquarters: Tallinn, Estonia Implementation Model: Bolt implemented 4-day workweeks in 2022, maintaining full compensation while reducing working days. The policy applies to all corporate employees, providing a consistent approach across the organization.

As a rapidly-growing technology company competing for talent globally, Bolt's implementation demonstrates how reduced workweeks function as a competitive advantage in recruitment and retention.

5. Kickstarter

Industry: Crowdfunding/Technology Headquarters: Brooklyn, New York, USA Implementation Model: Kickstarter transitioned to a 32-hour, 4-day workweek in 2022 without reducing compensation. Their implementation followed a pilot program that demonstrated maintained productivity with increased employee satisfaction.

The company's public advocacy for the model has contributed significantly to visibility and normalization of reduced work schedules in the technology sector.

6. Buffer

Industry: Social Media Management Headquarters: Fully distributed (remote) Implementation Model: Buffer introduced 4-day workweeks in 2020 as a temporary pandemic measure, then made the change permanent after observing sustained productivity and improved well-being. Their 32-hour workweek maintains full compensation.

As a fully remote organization, Buffer demonstrates how 4-day models effectively complement distributed work arrangements, providing flexibility that supports remote work environments.

7. Elephant Ventures

Industry: Software and Data Engineering Headquarters: New York, New York, USA Implementation Model: Elephant Ventures transitioned to 4-day, 32-hour workweeks without compensation reduction. The company reports improved productivity, work quality, and reduced employee burnout since implementation.

Their comprehensive approach includes structured communication protocols and workflow optimization to maximize effectiveness during the compressed schedule.

8. DNB ASA

Industry: Financial Services Headquarters: Oslo, Norway Implementation Model: Norway's largest financial services group introduced flexible 4-day workweeks for certain divisions in 2023, allowing employees to compress their hours into fewer days while maintaining service availability.

DNB's implementation demonstrates how traditionally conservative sectors like banking can adapt reduced-hour models to meet both employee needs and operational requirements.

9. Atom Bank

Industry: Digital Banking Headquarters: Durham, United Kingdom Implementation Model: Atom Bank became the largest UK company to implement a 4-day, 34-hour workweek without salary reduction in 2021. Their transition reduced employee turnover by 45% and increased job applications by 500%.

Their implementation provides valuable data on how reduced workweeks function in regulated financial environments that require consistent service delivery.

10. Basecamp

Industry: Project Management Software Headquarters: Chicago, Illinois, USA Implementation Model: Basecamp implemented seasonal 4-day workweeks during summer months (May through September), maintaining full compensation while reducing hours. This approach provides employees with extended weekends during months when work-life balance is particularly valued.

Their seasonal implementation demonstrates how organizations can pilot reduced schedules strategically before considering permanent adoption.

Implementation Considerations for Organizations

Organizations considering 4-day workweek adoption should evaluate several critical factors:

Productivity Optimization Requirements

Reducing work hours while maintaining output necessitates operational optimization, including:

Reducing meeting time and frequency

Implementing asynchronous communication protocols

Leveraging automation for routine tasks

Establishing clear prioritization frameworks

Developing focused work periods with minimal interruption

Organizations that implement these changes before transitioning to reduced hours report smoother adaptations.

Industry-Specific Adaptations

Implementation approaches vary significantly by industry:

Service industries: Staggered schedules to maintain customer coverage

Manufacturing: Shift adjustments to maintain production continuity

Knowledge work: Focus on output measurement rather than time monitoring

Healthcare: Compressed shifts with careful attention to fatigue management

Successful implementations tailor the approach to specific operational needs rather than applying universal solutions.

Measurement Frameworks

Effective implementation requires robust metrics tracking:

Productivity indicators specific to role functions

Employee well-being and satisfaction measures

Turnover and recruitment analytics

Customer satisfaction impacts

Financial performance metrics

Organizations demonstrating the most successful transitions establish comprehensive measurement systems before implementation to track outcomes effectively.

The Business Case for Reduced Workweeks

The 4-day workweek presents compelling business advantages beyond employee satisfaction:

Talent Attraction and Retention

In competitive labor markets, reduced workweeks provide significant differentiation. Organizations implementing these policies report:

60% reduction in absenteeism

45-50% decrease in employee turnover

300-500% increases in qualified job applications

Expanded talent pools including caregivers and others requiring flexibility

These metrics translate to substantial recruitment cost savings and increased organizational knowledge retention.

Environmental Impact

Reduced commuting days contribute to:

20-25% reduction in employee carbon footprints

Decreased office energy consumption

Reduced infrastructure requirements

Lower overall resource utilization

Organizations with sustainability commitments increasingly recognize workweek reduction as an effective environmental strategy.

Productivity and Innovation

Contrary to initial concerns, properly implemented 4-day workweeks often enhance productivity through:

Improved focus during work hours

Increased urgency to complete tasks efficiently

Enhanced creativity from proper recovery time

Reduced presenteeism and increased engagement

Greater process innovation to accommodate time constraints

These factors contribute to maintained or increased output despite reduced working hours.

Future Outlook and Strategic Implications

Current adoption trends suggest continued expansion of 4-day workweek implementation:

Projected Adoption Trajectory

Analysis of implementation data and organizational announcements indicates:

15-20% of knowledge work organizations likely to adopt some form of reduced workweek by 2027

Growing competitive pressure for adoption in talent-constrained industries

Increased governmental experimentation with supportive policies

Development of industry-specific implementation frameworks

This trajectory suggests organizations should begin strategic planning for potential implementation, even if immediate adoption isn't planned.

Competitive Considerations

As adoption increases, organizations maintaining traditional schedules may face:

Talent attraction challenges compared to competitors offering reduced hours

Pressure from employees for schedule parity

Potential productivity disadvantages without compensating optimization

Public perception challenges regarding work culture

Forward-thinking organizations are developing contingency planning for potential implementation to address these competitive factors.

Learn Any Language with Kylian AI

Private language lessons are expensive. Paying between 15 and 50 euros per lesson isn’t realistic for most people—especially when dozens of sessions are needed to see real progress.

Many learners give up on language learning due to these high costs, missing out on valuable professional and personal opportunities.

That’s why we created Kylian: to make language learning accessible to everyone and help people master a foreign language without breaking the bank.

To get started, just tell Kylian which language you want to learn and what your native language is

Tired of teachers who don’t understand your specific struggles as a French speaker? Kylian’s advantage lies in its ability to teach any language using your native tongue as the foundation.

Unlike generic apps that offer the same content to everyone, Kylian explains concepts in your native language (French) and switches to the target language when necessary—perfectly adapting to your level and needs.

This personalization removes the frustration and confusion that are so common in traditional language learning.

Choose a specific topic you want to learn

Frustrated by language lessons that never cover exactly what you need? Kylian can teach you any aspect of a language—from pronunciation to advanced grammar—by focusing on your specific goals.

Avoid vague requests like “How can I improve my accent?” and be precise: “How do I pronounce the R like a native English speaker?” or “How do I conjugate the verb ‘to be’ in the present tense?”

With Kylian, you’ll never again pay for irrelevant content or feel embarrassed asking “too basic” questions to a teacher. Your learning plan is entirely personalized.

Once you’ve chosen your topic, just hit the “Generate a Lesson” button, and within seconds, you’ll get a lesson designed exclusively for you.

Join the room to begin your lesson

The session feels like a one-on-one language class with a human tutor—but without the high price or time constraints.

In a 25-minute lesson, Kylian teaches exactly what you need to know about your chosen topic: the nuances that textbooks never explain, key cultural differences between French and your target language, grammar rules, and much more.

Ever felt frustrated trying to keep up with a native-speaking teacher, or embarrassed to ask for something to be repeated? With Kylian, that problem disappears. It switches intelligently between French and the target language depending on your level, helping you understand every concept at your own pace.

During the lesson, Kylian uses role-plays, real-life examples, and adapts to your learning style. Didn’t understand something? No problem—you can pause Kylian anytime to ask for clarification, without fear of being judged.

Ask all the questions you want, repeat sections if needed, and customize your learning experience in ways traditional teachers and generic apps simply can’t match.

With 24/7 access at a fraction of the cost of private lessons, Kylian removes all the barriers that have kept you from mastering the language you’ve always wanted to learn.